Oh yeah
Boot up
You get the GUI out front
Hottest styles, every theme, every color
Yeah, when you’re root it can be kinda fun
As long as your password is never discovered
In some ways you’re just like all your friends
But on the internetz you’re a star
You get the best of both OS’s
Run Windows, take it slow
Then Linux rocks out the show
You get the best of both OS’s
Mix it all together and you know that it’s the best of both OS’s
The best of both OS’s
You go to software premiers (is that Linus Torvalds?)
Hear songs on Pandora radio
Bootin’ two OS’s is a little weird (yeah)
But tech support’s cool cuz nobody knows
Yeah you get to be a Windows loser
But big time when you sudo
You get the best of both OS’s
Run Windows, take it slow
Then Linux rocks out the show
You get the best of both OS’s
Mix it all together and you know that it’s the best of both
(You know the best) You know the best of both OS’s
Pictures and videos
You get your face in all the social networks
The best parts that you get to run whatever software you wanna run
Yeah the best of both
You get the best of both
Come on best of both
Who would of thought that a loser like me
Would double as a Linux rock star
You get the best of both OS’s
Run Windows, take it slow
Then Linux rocks out the show
You get the best of both OS’s
Mix it all together and you know that it’s the best,
You get the best of both OS’s
Without the viruses and malware
You can surf anywhere
You get the best of both systems
Mix it all together
Oh yeah
It’s so much better cuz you know you’ve got the best of both OS’s

This site is sheer genius.

theknighttoyourtime:

super-scout:

aetropos:

starexorcist:

tehmostaewsumblogevar:

starexorcist:

ecrusher:

10knotes:

M&Ms Droplets

now that’s what photography should be about… not a black and white picture of someone’s shoes

The top picture is full of M&M’s. They’re bule, red, orange, green, yellow, and brown.

But in the bottom picture we clearly see there’s white, pink, and even purple candies in the bowl.

The bottom picture is of gumballs! This concludes that the bottom picture is not taken with that camera at all. I’d even go as far to say that it was edited in photoshop with a filter!

Yes the above image and the below image are not the same photograph being taken. This is rather obvious.

BUT Mr. Wright there is one thing you overlooked. Examine the droplets on the bottom image. None of them are from the same angle. This is a natural occurance when looking through water droplets.

Is it not possible that the photographer took the second image first?

Would it not be more probable that when asked HOW it was taken he/she took the above image of their setup Using M&Ms, something much more common in a household rather than many gumballs, something they may have just bought for the original photo? 

So to claim it was not taken with the same camera is indeed a long shot Mr. Wright.

Thank you for your time.

Really Edgeworth, is that you’re argument.

Aren’t you overlooking the fact that there are no pink M&Ms. This proves undeniably that these are not, in fact M&Ms, but some other kind of candy.

And one other thing, I find it highly improbable that not one piece of candy is facing so the M logo is on the candy.

So in conclusion, there is no way these are possibly M&Ms.

hey mister I think you’re confuuuuuuused. Edgeworth agreed that they weren’t M&M’s. He was just refuting that there is a possibility there wasnt any photoshop used and that the above image was only depicting the method used in the bottom image.

I think someone might be getting a little senile hehehe

Everyone seems to be walking around the accusations by examining whether they are or aren’t M&Ms. That is not what’s important. What we should be looking at is instead, the so-called droplets, compared to the background image.

The angles within the droplets do not realistically coincide with one another! As well, I don’t spend much time staring at drops of water, but I can surely say I’ve never seen such clarity in any water droplet. Also, as in the former picture, there is an obvious fogging on the glass, surely caused by whichever process was used to spray the water. Where is the fog? 

On top of all that, the drops are amazingly tiny compared to the anonymous-candy. One could argue the sheet is further away than in the ‘example’ pic, but the blurring of the candies definitely objects to that. We could also try to assume that the spray method used in the ‘original’ photo caused much tinier water spots, but are we to believe that the photographer was so careless that they couldn’t recreate the correct droplet size in the ‘example’? Surely, they should have been able to cause at least a closer resemblance.

Sure seems like they went out of their way to showcase the methodology of how the photograph was taken, yet neglected to go far enough to ensure it could be a like-comparison?

Rather unlikely!

Actually, Mr. Godot!! 

Well, according to the properties of light and the way it’s refracted…

If you mirror it the right way, they line up just fine!

Hold on there, pups. You’re all going in completely different directions. Shih-na, if you will?

Lang Zi says: “The truth lies not at the exit, but rather, shines outside the maze itself.”

You need to see past the boundaries given to you in order to figure out the actual purpose and, as much as I’d hate to admit, both Mr. Prosecutor and the crow-girl have some pretty tame ground under their feet with those assumptions.

As said before, it’s logical to assume the photographer is merely depicting the method used in order to get the results shown in the second photo—and it can be just that.

But what if it’s something else entirely?

We’re all wolves who’ve been swindled by the coyote that has stolen our kill. How do we know if the photographer just isn’t using some clever ploy to get us all confused? He could have taken these pictures separately and simply put them together with getting us riled up in mind.

I think we all need to reconsider our options, here.

I wish all Tumblr photos could be debunked like this. This is amazing.

aidosaur:

OH MAN I REMEMBER THIS.  Questionable Content guest comic from 2009.  Brush and ink, photoshop.

Ananth and I did this comic for Jeph a few years ago.  I see it floating around the internet now and again, which delights me to no end.  Even more delightful are the edits that pop up.  I’ve seen the “AND THEN THEY FUCKED” panel traced/parodied at least a half dozen times for a half dozen different fandoms and I think that’s the best, coolest thing.

If you guys have any edits/remixes lying around, I’d seriously love to see them!

sammneiland:

bestifusedby:

Is there a Homestuck edit for this?

oh hi yuko’s art. glad you could make it on my dashboard via non yuko methods.

If you play Zelda, this should make you jizz your pants.

coarsefur:

heartvideogames:

fuckyeahhyrule:

string-theory-etc:

Open two tabs.

In tab one open link numbah one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HcOjpG27LEQ

Then go to tab two and open link numbah two: http://www.rainymood.com/

Now sit back and feel BAMF.

reblogging again for the awesomeness~

I listened to this while I worked on costumes for Otakon, and I felt like a fucking WIZARD. Still wish I’d had the budget this summer to put together some more Legend of Zelda cosplay.

Yet another reason to love the hell out of RainyMoods. First Chell, now Link.

(Source: youre-a-wizard-taylor)

pseudo-tsuga:

Look at your series. Now look at Korra. Look at your series, then back to Korra. Sadly, your series isn’t magnificent. But if it had 20’s Asian steampunk, it might be. Look down, look back up, where are you? You’re at Union City, with the series your series could be like. What’s in your hand? Look back at me, it’s a trailer with all the fight scenes you love. Look again, the trailer is now in HQ. Anything is possible when your series has a lady protagonist. I’m on a polar bear-dog.

And then recount them from memory at monthly storytelling sessions. Aw yisssss.

> Troll Canada: Elect the conservative bloodist party.

Screw these guys, you’re going home.

> Move to Troll Canada

jnbrg:

GPOY.

DEAR LADY GAGA

thismakesmeanxious:

baby, i am the way that i currently am.
born it, became it, it don’t mean a damn.
cuz culture ‘n’ society ARE consequential.
and identities are neither ahistorical nor essential.
so don’t fucking tell me i was born this way.
mostly because i am no longer an infant, okay?
also just for the record “oriental“‘s a slight
read up on Foucault and Said some, alright?

Oh good, I’m not the only one who was wincing every time I heard “cholo” and “oriental” in there.

I’m typically not much of a fan of mass-produced artists in general, but between the two releases, I think Pink’s “Raise Your Glass” has a much better message. (Interesting imagery in the video, too; not too sure I agree with half of it, but it certainly packs a mental punch, which is likely what was aimed for.)